Fantasies of the Unconscious - Creatures of the dappled light
Posted by GummyBear under Blogging, Nature, Personal
(4) Comments
• (3320) Reads
• Permalink

There are so many interesting things to see at the Raffles Museum
It was a pleasant surprise reading the newspapers of late with all the calls for the setting up of a Natural History Museum here in Singapore.
Being a skeptic at heart, I wondered more than once if this was the work of a small vocal lobby group trying to rally public opinion to further an isolated cause or did it really represent a new-found national consciousness aimed at bringing back into the spotlight, some long-forgotten gems of our natural history.
For me, visiting the old National Museum in Stamford Road as a kid was such a treat. As an animal lover, walking along those corridors, standing in awe in the presence of creatures of the dappled light, certainly fired the imagination of a young mind.
I stood eyeball to eyeball with a tiger and tried to fathom the last thoughts that went through her head when she met her fate probably from the business end of a gun. Were there some cubs waiting for her back in a den somewhere? Was she distressed that her forest home was being invaded by those thoughtless animals that walked on two legs?
It bothered me then and still does today that many of the exhibits that we now seek to remember and cherish as part of our natural history were trapped, shot, euthanised … slaughtered just so they could be mounted in a museum. I guess I have the same issues with keeping animals in cages at the zoo or in a bird park.
I remember this past week at work - horrible and sadly disappointing though it was - one uplifting moment was watching a hawk (I call her Hillary after the indomitable spirit of her Clinton namesake) soaring with the thermals high over Hill Street. She may have been hunting for its next meal - a struggle to keep body and soul together for just another day - but I couldn’t help feeling that her aerial display was a celebration of freedom … of life as it was meant to be - a living example of our natural heritage in its full glory.
What was missing from the National Museum of old? It certainly wasn’t a lack of things to see. It offered much. No, it was the people. The museum was always empty and I could never understand why. It wasn’t that the building was tucked away in some ulu part of Singapore or that it was expensive. The sad conclusion was that there just wasn’t enough of public interest.
As the country moved on and turned its attention on other worldly things, so too did the National Museum. The history of the Singapore people went on show and the animal specimens were packed up and soon to be forgotten. Eventually they found their home at the Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research (RMBR) - tucked away in an ulu corner of the National University of Singapore. It was like moving from a palace into a HDB flat. But for those who took the trouble to visit, the museum - tiny though it was - still held that quaint, honest charm without the bells and whistles of our modern museums with their touch-screens, surround sounds and artistic lighting.

Killing to preserve
But at RMBR - the stories were still there - some full of wonder, others incredibly sad.
And so here we are today, waking up with calls from The Sunday Times to create a Museum of Natural History big enough to showcase the many wonders we have kept in storage for far too long and housed in a place easily accessible to everyone.
Personally I hope this does happen … again. But the skeptic in me is less than confident that it would be as successful and alluring as the pundits make it out to be. When all the chest thumping purists have moved on to champion other causes, will the Museum of Natural History resonate with the common Singaporean? Or is going to go the way of my exercise bike - great to have one - should be used more often - but there it sits gathering dust supporting my lonely chipped coffee mug.
I wonder what Hillary would say to such a debate. It probably wouldn’t bother her one way or the other. If you want to celebrate our natural history, take a walk around Bukit Timah Hill and experience the wonders of nature for yourself. Go bring your kids to catch some longkang fish, climb a tree and feel nature or look up to the skies for Hillary and her kind. For if none of these move your spirit, having a big ole empty building filled with old remnants of nature extinguished, wouldn’t make a damn difference. Those halls would surely remain empty - devoid of people and history would have repeated itself.
Here’s an old video about the Raffles Museum …















(4) Comments
Posted by: acroamatic
Posted on: June 15th, 2009
I hope this happens too. However, I think that the museum is an important part of allowing people to (re)discover the nature in our backyard. You won't need to know how to dive to see the wonders in the sea. You won't need to spend months on end waiting to spot a leopard cat. In the museum, you will not be doing any harm to specific creatures or habitats, some of which are very sensitive to human presence. And there might be a reminder or two about how our carelessness can lead to the loss of species. The museum, together with our parks, nature areas and even our zoological attractions can all play a part in ensuring that our natural heritage is something that very much enjoyed and cared for.
Posted by: dustbin.sg
Posted on: June 15th, 2009
Yeah nature can be such a fragile thing. Just read this off-beat story (http://www.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idUSTRE55D0GG20090614) about Alaska's Rat Island that is now finally rat-free. Some 200 years ago, the rats escaped from a sinking Japanese ship. They made it to the island and took it over decimating the local bird population. It took two centuries to get rid of the rats and now the birds are slowly returning. Nature needs to be handled with great care!
Posted by: Ivan Chew
Posted on: June 15th, 2009
I'd like to see a larger Natural History collection in the National Museum ofSingapore. I remember spending the most time viewing the William Farquhar collection of natural history drawings back in the old history museum. Even though they were paintings, I felt they were the most vibrant collections in the entire building. But even back then, it's a shame I've never associated "History Museum" with "Nature". Not until I visited museums in other countries, when I realised we seem to have a limited view of "museums" in Singapore. I slowly realised that nature is also part of my Singaporean heritage. And that history is not necessarily only about the inanimate past, but about the living as well.
Posted by: budak
Posted on: June 16th, 2009
there's much to be said about the outreach and education value and role of a natural history museum. But few, if any, have thought about the research and curatorial aspects of a natural history museum, which are quite different tasks compared to that of a history or art museum. An outfit like RMBR works with numerous other scientific organisations local and overseas to carry out field research, manage specimens and collections and add to the existing pool of data and knowledge about biodiversity and ecology. I am all for expanding the public galleries or even a whole new NHM, but the endeavour should continue to be rooted in, and not at the expense of, the research work that the RMBR currently carries out.
Post a Comment